home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20000114-20000217
/
000083_news@columbia.edu _Wed Jan 19 07:26:16 2000.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2000-02-16
|
3KB
Return-Path: <news@columbia.edu>
Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.59.30])
by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA04359
for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:26:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA28892
for kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:18:39 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu: news set sender to <news> using -f
Subject: Re: MS-DOS Kermit, more capabalities
From: cangel@famvid.com
Message-ID: <aXhh4.10311$NU6.453940@tw12.nn.bcandid.com>
Organization: bCandid - Powering the world's discussions - http://bCandid.com
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:17:10 GMT
To: kermit.misc@columbia.edu
On 1900-01-18 jrd@cc.usu.edu(JoeDoupnik) said:
JD> Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
JD>>> I think you've misunderstood Michel a bit here.
JD> Perhaps, but I am trying to stick to issues rather than
JD> people.
The issues can wait, people should be first.
JD> I am direct because I have little time to spend on
JD> individual messages that ramble. I have discarded 95% of
JD> the taunts and jabs as not worth effort to re-read, and
JD> continued negative personal commments by you do not improve
JD> matters. And I have been candid about the zmodem part of
JD> things.
JD> Please recall I pointed to the sources on my machines.
Yes, I wasn't going to even get into that. The directory you
specified does not exist, the files do not exist in any other
directory - I looked.
Neither you nor the other members of this `team' has give one
correct URL but there have been quite a few that go nowhere.
A Mr. Dold finally realized what was making me so furious and
posted the correct URL or I wouldn't have the code even now.
JD> As far as I am concerned the issues are plain enough, and
JD> my response has been published on the list. I don't like
JD> saying no to folks, it is not my preferred way to behave,
JD> but there are limits and this item exceeds them.
The above paragraph reduces to a non-statement regarding an
unknown quantity referenced as `item'.
JD> It's my call.
I don't know what you are calling but not me I know that much.
Around here you're just Joe and Joe doesn't make the calls
here, I do.
JD> You have sources, so please dig into them if this item is
JD> that important to you.
I infer by the context you are using that `item' means "the
ability to access external protocols"? No Joe, the item is not
that important to me. What _is_ important is getting a
runaround when I ask where the source code is.
All this negative feedback because of the insecurities all of
you seem to be suffering from is more depressing than you can
imagine. I'm not even angry anymore, I'm just saddened that
your group has degenerated to this level.
>
> , ,
> o/ Charles.Angelich \o ,
> <| @AngelFire.com |> __o/
> / > USA, MI < \ __\__